Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 36(1): 86-96, 2003 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12491207

RESUMO

A simulation model of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, which incorporated French data on the progression of HIV disease in the absence of antiretroviral therapy and on cost, was used to determine the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of different strategies for the prevention of opportunistic infections in French patients who receive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Compared with use of no prophylaxis, use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) increased per-person lifetime costs from euro 185,600 to euro 187,900 and quality-adjusted life expectancy from 112.2 to 113.7 months, for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of euro 18,700 per quality-adjusted life-year (euro/QALY) gained. Compared with use of TMP-SMZ alone, use of TMP-SMZ plus azithromycin cost euro 23,900/QALY gained; adding fluconazole cost an additional euro 54,500/QALY gained. All strategies that included oral ganciclovir had cost-effectiveness ratios that exceeded euro 100,000/QALY gained. In the era of HAART, on the basis of French data, prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, toxoplasmic encephalitis, and Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia is cost-effective. Prophylaxis against fungal and cytomegalovirus infections is less cost-effective than are other therapeutic options for HIV disease and should remain of lower priority.


Assuntos
Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/economia , Quimioprevenção/economia , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/prevenção & controle , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/economia , Quimioprevenção/normas , Análise Custo-Benefício , França , Guias como Assunto , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Expectativa de Vida , Qualidade de Vida
3.
Vaccine ; 17(2): 142-51, 1999 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9987148

RESUMO

The purpose of the cost-benefit analysis described in this article is to determine the economic value of vaccination of healthy children against varicella in France. It is based on the results of two specific investigations--an epidemiological model and a prospective observational study (1832 cases studied) of the socio-economic consequences of varicella. This cost-benefit analysis was conducted from the viewpoint of the society and that of the patient, for vaccination coverage rates ranging from 10 to 90%. This analysis demonstrates the value of varicella vaccination when associated with measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination: if varicella and MMR vaccines are co-administered, the vaccination of 80% of the children against varicella leads to a reduction in medical costs associated with varicella including that of vaccination, ranging from 10 to 77% according to the values adopted for vaccination costs, varicella treatment costs, discount rate and vaccine efficacy. The results of this study also underline the benefits of a vaccination policy that aims to achieve a high rate of coverage, thereby reaping the highest benefit from vaccination, and also avoiding potential negative consequences.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/economia , Vacina contra Varicela/farmacologia , Varicela/economia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Varicela/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Coleta de Dados , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Modelos Biológicos , Vacina contra Caxumba/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Vacina contra Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Vacinas Combinadas/administração & dosagem
4.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 45(2): 131-41, 1997 Apr.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9221442

RESUMO

In order to provide greater safety in blood transfusions, public health authorities have imposed the use of screening tests. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the cost-effectiveness ratios of the screening test used in France. Four risks were studied: HIV, HBV, HCV and HTLV. Two efficiency measures were used: cost per positive blood donation detected and cost per case of prevented infection transmission. Moreover, for HTLV alone, the efficiency was estimated by the cost per prevented pathology. Data concerning the costs were provided by the French Blood Agency; those concerning the results of the screening campaigns were provided by the official health authorities, the other data used in the calculations were drawn either from the French Blood Agency data or from a review of international literature. Results gave information about the expenditure devoted to the screening of virologic risks associated with blood transfusion in France (250 million francs per year for the four viruses studied). They stressed the differences in screening efficiency according to the test studied (the cost by prevented seroconversion varied from 31,795 francs for HBV, 72,180 francs for HCV, 676,596 francs for HIV to 6,137,346 francs for HTLV screening test in the base case) and especially the very low efficiency of the systematic screening of the HTLV virus (from 34 to 307 million francs per prevented leukemia).


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/economia , Sangue/virologia , Transfusão de Sangue/normas , Análise Custo-Benefício , França , HIV/isolamento & purificação , Gastos em Saúde , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Vírus da Hepatite B/isolamento & purificação , Vírus Linfotrópico T Tipo 1 Humano/isolamento & purificação , Vírus Linfotrópico T Tipo 2 Humano/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Testes Imunológicos/economia , Masculino
5.
Ann Endocrinol (Paris) ; 54(4): 293-6, 1993.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8092807

RESUMO

This article studies how two diagnostic tests (cytological puncture and 201thallium scanning) can be combined to obtain a more efficient approach of cold thyroid nodules. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are compared on the basis of four criteria: financial cost (immediate and delayed), number of labelled cancers, pre- and postoperative death rates and number of complications.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide/terapia , Biópsia por Agulha , França , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Radioisótopos de Tálio , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA